List of quantum processors
This list contains quantum processors, also known as quantum processing units (QPUs). Some devices listed below have only been announced at press conferences so far, with no actual demonstrations or scientific publications characterizing the performance.
Quantum processors are difficult to compare due to the different architectures and approaches. Due to this, published qubit numbers do not reflect the performance levels of the processor. This is instead achieved through benchmarking metrics such as Quantum volume, Randomized benchmarking or CLOPS.[1]
Circuit-based quantum processors
These QPUs are based on the quantum circuit and quantum logic gate-based model of computing.
Manufacturer | Name/Codename/Designation | Architecture | Layout | Socket | Fidelity | Qubits (Logical) | Release date | Quantum Volume |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIKEN | RIKEN | Superconducting | N/A | N/A | N/A | 64 qb | 2023 | |
N/A | Superconducting | N/A | N/A | 99.5%[2] | 20 qb | 2017 | ||
N/A | Superconducting | 7×7 lattice | N/A | 99.7%[2] | 49 qb[3] | Q4 2017 (planned) | ||
Bristlecone | Superconducting transmon | 6×12 lattice | N/A | 99% (readout) 99.9% (1 qubit) 99.4% (2 qubits) | 72 qb[4][5] | March 5, 2018 | ||
Sycamore | Superconducting transmon | 9×6 lattice | N/A | N/A | 53 qb effective | 2019 | ||
USTC | Jiuzhang | Photonics | N/A | N/A | N/A | 76 qb[6][7] | 2020 | |
USTC | Zuchongzhi | Superconducting | N/A | N/A | N/A | 62 qb[8] | 2020 | |
Quandela | Ascella | Photonics | N/A | N/A | 98.8% (1 qubit) 88.1% (2 qubits) 86.0% (3 qubits) |
6 qb[9] | 2022[10] | |
Xanadu | Borealis[11] | Photonics | N/A | N/A | N/A | 216 qb[11] | 2022[11] | |
Xanadu | X8 [12] | Photonics | N/A | N/A | N/A | 8 qb | 2020 | |
Xanadu | X12 | Photonics | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12 qb | 2020[12] | |
Xanadu | X24 | Photonics | N/A | N/A | N/A | 24 qb | 2020[12] | |
IBM | IBM Q 5 Tenerife | Superconducting | bow tie | N/A | 99.897% (average gate) 98.64% (readout) |
5 qb | 2016[2] | |
IBM | IBM Q 5 Yorktown | Superconducting | bow tie | N/A | 99.545% (average gate) 94.2% (readout) |
5 qb | ||
IBM | IBM Q 14 Melbourne | Superconducting | N/A | N/A | 99.735% (average gate) 97.13% (readout) |
14 qb | ||
IBM | IBM Q 16 Rüschlikon | Superconducting | 2×8 lattice | N/A | 99.779% (average gate) 94.24% (readout) |
16 qb[13] | May 17, 2017 (Retired: 26 September 2018)[14] | |
IBM | IBM Q 17 | Superconducting | N/A | N/A | N/A | 17 qb[13] | May 17, 2017 | |
IBM | IBM Q 20 Tokyo | Superconducting | 5×4 lattice | N/A | 99.812% (average gate) 93.21% (readout) |
20 qb[15] | November 10, 2017 | |
IBM | IBM Q 20 Austin | Superconducting | 5×4 lattice | N/A | N/A | 20 qb | (Retired: 4 July 2018)[14] | |
IBM | IBM Q 50 prototype | Superconducting transmon | N/A | N/A | N/A | 50 qb[15] | ||
IBM | IBM Q 53 | Superconducting | N/A | N/A | N/A | 53 qb | October 2019 | |
IBM | IBM Eagle | Superconducting | N/A | N/A | N/A | 127 qb | November 2021 | |
IBM | IBM Osprey | Superconducting | N/A | N/A | N/A | 433 qb | November 2022 | |
Intel | 17-Qubit Superconducting Test Chip | Superconducting | N/A | 40-pin cross gap | N/A | 17 qb[16][17] | October 10, 2017 | |
Intel | Tangle Lake | Superconducting | N/A | 108-pin cross gap | N/A | 49 qb[18] | January 9, 2018 | |
Rigetti | 8Q Agave | Superconducting | N/A | N/A | N/A | 8 qb | June 4, 2018[19] | |
Rigetti | 16Q Aspen-1 | Superconducting | N/A | N/A | N/A | 16 qb | November 30, 2018[19] | |
Rigetti | 19Q Acorn | Superconducting transmon | N/A | N/A | N/A | 19 qb[20] | December 17, 2017 | |
Rigetti | Aspen-M-3 | Superconducting transmon | N/A | N/A | 99.9% (Single-qubit gates) 94.7% (Two-qubit gates CZ) 95.1% (Two-qubit gates XY) | 80 qb[21] | December 2, 2022 | |
IBM | IBM Armonk[22] | Superconducting | Single Qubit | N/A | N/A | 1 qb | October 16, 2019 | |
IBM | IBM Ourense[22] | Superconducting | T | N/A | N/A | 5 qb | July 3, 2019 | |
IBM | IBM Vigo[22] | Superconducting | T | N/A | N/A | 5 qb | July 3, 2019 | |
IBM | IBM London[22] | Superconducting | T | N/A | N/A | 5 qb | September 13, 2019 | |
IBM | IBM Burlington[22] | Superconducting | T | N/A | N/A | 5 qb | September 13, 2019 | |
IBM | IBM Essex[22] | Superconducting | T | N/A | N/A | 5 qb | September 13, 2019 | |
IBM | IBM Athens [23] | Superconducting | QV32 [24] | N/A | N/A | 5 qb | ||
IBM | IBM Belem[23] | Superconducting | QV16 | N/A | N/A | 5 qb | ||
IBM | IBM Bogotá [23] | Superconducting | QV32 [24] | N/A | N/A | 5 qb | ||
IBM | IBM Casablanca [23] | Superconducting | QV32 [24] | N/A | N/A | 7 qb | (Retired - March 2022) | |
IBM | IBM Dublin [23] | Superconducting | QV64 | N/A | N/A | 27 qb | ||
IBM | IBM Guadalupe [23] | Superconducting | QV32 [24] | N/A | N/A | 16 qb | ||
IBM | IBM Kolkata | Superconducting | QV128 | N/A | N/A | 27 qb | ||
IBM | IBM Lima [23] | Superconducting | QV8 | N/A | N/A | 5 qb | ||
IBM | IBM Manhattan [23] | Superconducting | QV32 [24] | N/A | N/A | 65 qb | ||
IBM | IBM Montreal [23] | Superconducting | QV128 | N/A | N/A | 27 qb | 128[25] | |
IBM | IBM Mumbai [23] | Superconducting | QV128 | N/A | N/A | 27 qb | ||
IBM | IBM Paris [23] | Superconducting | QV32 [24] | N/A | N/A | 27 qb | ||
IBM | IBM Quito [23] | Superconducting | QV16 | N/A | N/A | 5 qb | ||
IBM | IBM Rome [23] | Superconducting | QV32 [24] | N/A | N/A | 5 qb | ||
IBM | IBM Santiago [23] | Superconducting | QV32 [24] | N/A | N/A | 5 qb | ||
IBM | IBM Sydney [23] | Superconducting | QV32 [24] | N/A | N/A | 27 qb | ||
IBM | IBM Toronto [23] | Superconducting | QV32 [24] | N/A | N/A | 27 qb | ||
QuTech at TU Delft | Spin-2 | Semiconductor spin qubits | 99% (average gate) 85%(readout)[26] |
2 qb | 2020 | |||
QuTech at TU Delft | Starmon-5 | Superconducting | X configuration | 97% (readout)[27] | 5 qb | 2020 | ||
IonQ | Trapped ion | 32x1 chain[28] | N/A | 99.98% (1 qubit) 98.5-99.3% (2 qubit)[28] |
32 qb | |||
Oxford Quantum Circuits | Lucy[29] | Superconducting | N/A | 8 qb | 2022 | |||
Quantinuum | H1-1[30] | Trapped ion | 15×15 (Circuit Size) | N/A | 20 qb | 2022 | 32,768[31] | |
Quantinuum | H1-2 [30] | Trapped ion | N/A | 12 qb | 2022 | 4096[32] | ||
Quantware | Soprano[33] | Superconducting | N/A | 99.9% (single-qubit gates) | 5 qb | July 2021 | ||
Quantware | Contralto[34] | Superconducting | N/A | 99.9% (single-qubit gates) | 25 qb | March 7, 2022[35] | ||
Quantware | Tenor[36] | Superconducting | N/A | 64 qb | February 23, 2023 | |||
Alpine Quantum Technologies | PINE System[37] | Trapped ion | N/A | 24 qb[38] | June 7, 2021 | 128[39] | ||
Atom Computing | Phoenix | Neutral atoms in optical lattices | N/A | 100 qb[40] | August 10, 2021 | |||
SpinQ | Triangulum | Nuclear magnetic resonance | N/A | 3 qb[41] | September 2021 |
Annealing quantum processors
These QPUs are based on quantum annealing.
Manufacturer | Name/Codename/Designation | Architecture | Layout | Socket | Fidelity | Qubits | Release date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D-Wave | D-Wave One (Rainier) | Superconducting | C4 = Chimera(4,4,4)[42] = 4×4 K4,4 | N/A | N/A | 128 qb | 11 May 2011 |
D-Wave | D-Wave Two | Superconducting | C8 = Chimera(8,8,4)[42] = 8×8 K4,4 | N/A | N/A | 512 qb | 2013 |
D-Wave | D-Wave 2X | Superconducting | C12 = Chimera(12,12,4)[42] = 12×12 K4,4 | N/A | N/A | 1152 qb | 2015 |
D-Wave | D-Wave 2000Q | Superconducting | C16 = Chimera(16,16,4)[42] = 16×16 K4,4 | N/A | N/A | 2048 qb | 2017 |
D-Wave | D-Wave Advantage | Superconducting | Pegasus P16[43] | N/A | N/A | 5760 qb | 2020 |
Analog quantum processors
These QPUs are based on analog Hamiltonian simulation.
Manufacturer | Name/Codename/Designation | Architecture | Layout | Socket | Fidelity | Qubits | Release date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QuEra | Aquila | Neutral atoms | N/A | N/A | N/A | 256 qb | Nov 2022 |
References
- Wack, Andrew; Paik, Hanhee; Javadi-Abhari, Ali; Jurcevic, Petar; Faro, Ismael; Gambetta, Jay M.; Johnson, Blake R. (29 Oct 2021). "A practical heuristic for finding graph minors". arXiv:2110.14108 [quant-ph].
- Lant, Karla (2017-06-23). "Google is Closer Than Ever to a Quantum Computer Breakthrough". Futurism. Retrieved 2017-10-18.
- Simonite, Tom (2017-04-21). "Google's New Chip Is a Stepping Stone to Quantum Computing Supremacy". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved 2017-10-18.
- "A Preview of Bristlecone, Google's New Quantum Processor", Research (World wide web log), Google, March 2018.
- Greene, Tristan (2018-03-06). "Google reclaims quantum computer crown with 72 qubit processor". The Next Web. Retrieved 2018-06-27.
- Ball, Philip (2020-12-03). "Physicists in China challenge Google's 'quantum advantage'". Nature. 588 (7838): 380. Bibcode:2020Natur.588..380B. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-03434-7. PMID 33273711.
- December 2020, Rafi Letzter-Staff Writer 07 (7 December 2020). "China claims fastest quantum computer in the world". livescience.com. Retrieved 2020-12-19.
- Ball, Philip (2020-12-03). "Strong Quantum Computational Advantage Using a Superconducting Quantum Processor". PhysRevLett. 127 (18). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.180501.
- Pont, M.; Corrielli, G.; Fyrillas, A.; et, al. (2022-11-29). "High-fidelity generation of four-photon GHZ states on-chip". arXiv:2211.15626 [quant-ph].
- "La puissance d'un ordinateur quantique testée en ligne (The power of a quantum computer tested online)". Le Monde.
- Madsen, Lars S.; Laudenbach, Fabian; Askarani, Mohsen Falamarzi; Rortais, Fabien; Vincent, Trevor; Bulmer, Jacob F. F.; Miatto, Filippo M.; Neuhaus, Leonhard; Helt, Lukas G.; Collins, Matthew J.; Lita, Adriana E. (June 2022). "Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor". Nature. 606 (7912): 75–81. Bibcode:2022Natur.606...75M. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04725-x. ISSN 1476-4687. PMC 9159949. PMID 35650354. S2CID 249276257.
- "A new kind of quantum". spie.org. Retrieved 2021-01-09.
- "IBM Builds Its Most Powerful Universal Quantum Computing Processors". IBM. 2017-05-17. Retrieved 2017-10-18.
- "Quantum devices & simulators". IBM Q. 2018-06-05. Retrieved 2019-03-29.
- "IBM Announces Advances to IBM Quantum Systems & Ecosystem". 10 November 2017. Retrieved 10 November 2017.
- "Intel Delivers 17-Qubit Superconducting Chip with Advanced Packaging to QuTech". 2017-10-10. Retrieved 2017-10-18.
- Novet, Jordan (2017-10-10). "Intel shows off its latest chip for quantum computing as it looks past Moore's Law". CNBC. Retrieved 2017-10-18.
- "CES 2018: Intel's 49-Qubit Chip Shoots for Quantum Supremacy". 2018-01-09. Retrieved 2018-01-14.
- "QPU". Rigetti Computing. Archived from the original on 2019-05-16. Retrieved 2019-03-24.
- "Unsupervised Machine Learning on Rigetti 19Q with Forest 1.2". 2017-12-18. Retrieved 2018-03-21.
- "Aspen-M-3 Quantum Processor". Retrieved 2023-02-20.
- "IBM Q Experience". IBM Q Experience. Retrieved 2020-01-04.
- IBM Quantum. https://quantum-computing.ibm.com/, 2021
- IBM Research Blog. https://www.ibm.com/blogs/research/2020/07/qv32-performance/, 2021
- Gambetta, Jay. "On the same system (IBM Q System One - Montreal) that we hit a quantum volume of 64 the team recently achieved a quantum volume of 128". Twitter. Archived from the original on 2022-10-21. Retrieved 2023-03-20.
- "Spin-2". Quantum Inspire. Retrieved 5 May 2021.
- "Starmon-5". Quantum Inspire. Retrieved 4 May 2021.
- arXiv:2009.11482
- "Lucy". Oxford Quantum Circuits. Retrieved 20 Feb 2023.
- "Quantinuum System Model H1 Product Data Sheet" (PDF). Oxford Quantum Circuits. Retrieved 20 Feb 2023.
- "Quantum Volume reaches 5 digits for the first time: 5 perspectives on what it means for quantum computing". Quantinuum. Retrieved 24 Feb 2023.
- "Quantinuum Announces Quantum Volume 4096 Achievement". Quantinuum. Retrieved 24 Feb 2023.
- "Soprano specs". Quantware. Retrieved 1 Feb 2023.
- "Contralto specs". Quantware. Retrieved 21 Feb 2023.
- "QUANTWARE RELEASES 25-QUBIT CONTRALTO QPU". Quantware. Retrieved 21 Feb 2023.
- "Tenor specs". Quantware. Retrieved 26 Feb 2023.
- "THE SYSTEM IS THE FIRST COMMERCIAL 19-INCH RACK-MOUNTED ROOM-TEMPERATURE QUANTUM COMPUTER". AQT. Retrieved 21 Feb 2023.
- Pogorelov, I.; Feldker, T.; Et, al. (2021-06-07). "A compact ion-trap quantum computing demonstrator". arXiv:2101.11390 [quant-ph].
- "STATE OF QUANTUM COMPUTING IN EUROPE: AQT PUSHING PERFORMANCE WITH A QUANTUM VOLUME OF 128". AQT. Retrieved 24 Feb 2023.
- Barnes, Katrina; Battaglino, Peter; Et, al. (2021-10-08). "Assembly and coherent control of a register of nuclear spin qubits". arXiv:2108.04790 [quant-ph].
- "Triangulum3 qubits desktop NMR quantum computer". AQT. Retrieved 24 Feb 2023.
- Cai, Jun; Macready, Bill; Roy, Aidan (10 Jun 2014). "A practical heuristic for finding graph minors". arXiv:1406.2741 [quant-ph].
- Boothby, Kelly; Bunyk, Paul; Raymond, Jack; Roy, Aidan (29 Feb 2020). "Next-Generation Topology of D-Wave Quantum Processors". arXiv:2003.00133 [quant-ph].
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.