Talk:Ultimate Samurai (3.5e Class)
Why don't you fix your class instead of deleting the templates? -- Jota 02:15, 20 May 2009 (MDT)
Saves
... still make no sense. Jota 16:37, 20 May 2009 (MDT)
Kensai?
I thought these abilities had been covered in WotC's Complete Warrior with the kensai... --Gedren56 19:50, 20 May 2009 (MDT)
Rating
Power - 3/5 I give this class a 3 out of 5 because it's really just a fighter with a few minor addendums tacked on. The modified saves aren't a big difference (and they don't make any sense), and if you do choose to restrict the feats by forcing that they be taken in a certain pattern you make the class suck even more than the fighter. --Jota 02:07, 18 July 2009 (MDT)
Wording - 2.5/5 I give this class a 2.5 out of 5 because there are numerous (like in every sentence) grammar and punctuation errors, and a few spelling errors (servent, nblty, basicly), too. --Jota 02:07, 18 July 2009 (MDT)
Formatting - 2/5 I give this class a 2 out of 5 because it doesn't follow the preload at all and it seems as though no effort was made to convert this from a word-processing file to something with coherent wiki formatting. --Jota 02:07, 18 July 2009 (MDT)
Flavor - 1/5 I give this class a 1 out of 5 because it's a samurai (hardly original), and a boring one at that (no fluff). --Jota 02:07, 18 July 2009 (MDT)
OA Mimic
I decided to edit the saves and feat gains to oriental adventures as it was nearly the same just barely different lvls...but i do like the Battojutsu addition. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Veku (talk • contribs) 01:46, 4 August 2010 (UTC). Please sign your posts.
- Keep in mind the table does not determine the class features. I changed the text to reflect your change in any case. --Green Dragon 17:33, 1 May 2011 (MDT)