Talk:Splintercaster (3.5e Class)

Rating

Balance - 4/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because damage at low levels is a little low; damage at upper levels is a little high. Minimal non-damage abilities. --Acoran (talk) 15:25, 15 June 2014 (MDT)

Wording - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because the majority of meaning is clear and concise. --Acoran (talk) 15:25, 15 June 2014 (MDT)

Formatting - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because the guidelines were followed with minimal formatting errors. --Acoran (talk) 15:25, 15 June 2014 (MDT)

Flavor - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because the concept and visual is fun, and flashy. --Acoran (talk) 15:25, 15 June 2014 (MDT)

Rating

Balance - X/5 I give this class a 4 out of 5 because damage at low levels is a little low; damage at upper levels is a little high. Minimal non-damage abilities. --Acoran (talk) 15:27, 15 June 2014 (MDT)

Wording - X/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because the majority of meaning is clear and concise. --Acoran (talk) 15:27, 15 June 2014 (MDT)

Formatting - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because the guidelines were followed with minimal formatting errors. --Acoran (talk) 15:27, 15 June 2014 (MDT)

Flavor - 5/5 I give this class a 5 out of 5 because the concept and visual is fun, and flashy. --Acoran (talk) 15:27, 15 June 2014 (MDT)

This article is issued from Dandwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.