Talk:Alchemist, 2nd Variant (3.5e Class)

Licensing

I see a lot of articles doing this - having released under OGC License templates on it. I presume this is mostly a byproduct of using an existing SRD article as a template. Should I take it upon myself to remove these? Or can they actually be legit? --SgtLion (talk) 09:33, 15 October 2013 (MDT)

Yes, they can. The licensing, though, needs to state its specificality. Here is what you should do though:
If the page looks like this one, e.g.
{{SRD Class Footer}}
[[Category:Base Class|{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]
[[Category:Psionic|{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]
Then you know that it is fine to remove the licensing, since it was just copy and pasted and is not specific to this page.
If, though, the page has something like:
{{OGL Bottom|a [http://datadeco.com/nbofeats/nbofeats012.html NBoF] Feat|[http://datadeco.com/nbofeats/nbofeats012.html NBoF]}}
where we can see the page's specificality detailed correctly, then leave it under the OGL. --Green Dragon (talk) 10:33, 15 October 2013 (MDT)
Copy that. Thanks kindly~ --SgtLion (talk) 10:47, 15 October 2013 (MDT)
This article is issued from Dandwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.